This is an article from Willen Felderhof from his facebook page!
A few months ago I visited Prof.Dr.Ir. Herman Russchenberg at the Technical University in Delft for a conversation on geoengineering. He is considered an expert on climate change, the role of clouds, rainfall and aerosols in the climate system but he is also a high priest in the anthropological Global Warming Cult. On that basis he is the director of the TU Delft Climate Institute.
I joined my friend and geo engineering activist Jerry Kooyman who fixed an appointment with Russchenberg at the Technical university in Delft. I had no illusions to change the mindset of the climate professor regarding the decades long ongoing spraying of our atmosphere; as a former cult member I know that’s impossible. I was more interested in the underlying psychological dynamics that make cult members ignore and deny blatant and often unpleasant realities. A definition of the man made global warming cult is:
A hierarchical fear-based system of religious veneration and devotion to the environment which espouses erroneous beliefs that are dangerous, especially to the lives, rights and freedoms of those who are NOT its members.
extensive evidence and studies by professors’ geophysics and climatology that
we brought with us to convince professor Russchenberg, he rigidly clung to the
erroneous belief that geo engineering is in a proposal phase and that
widespread aerosol injection of chemical particles as part of Solar Radiation
Management is not yet operational.
To get a feel of the psychopathological mindset these mentally ill people in places with authority, and therefore dangerous, have; I asked him what kind of changes we will observe in our skies at the moment they start injecting chemical particle aerosols compared to what we see now happening daily above our heads and in our face. He answered:” We will actually see not much difference with what we see now in our skies, because the spraying will be done on a relatively small scale and higher up in the stratosphere to the point that we can not see it.” At the same time, he dismissed the numerous studies and peer research by fellow (brilliant) professors and engineers because most of them were emeritus (therefore not part of his Cult), and therefore not credible.
The Man Made Global Warming position is fixed because it was achieved by corruption of the science and the scientific method. Science advances through proposing a hypothesis. Scientists then function as skeptics and challenge the assumptions on which they are based. The hypothesis became fact through the design of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). It’s the pattern of science driven by religious environmentalism as a political agenda. Deliberate personal and professional attacks sidelined those who tried to be scientific skeptics. These attacks were reinforced by the corporate mainstream media, who also accepted and promoted the hypothesis.
In the forty years between 1973 and 2013, decisions as to which medical scientific papers merited publication and which didn’t fell to only six major publishers— ACS; Reed Elsevier; Sage; Taylor & Francis; Springer; and Wiley-Blackwell—all in the back pocket of Big Pharma and the medical industry that profit from sickness, not health:
“As long as publishing in high impact factor journals is a requirement for researchers to obtain positions, research funding, and recognition from peers, the major commercial publishers will maintain their stranglehold on the academic publishing system.” Peer review is hindering science and has become a completely corrupt system. It’s corrupt in many ways, in that scientists and academics have handed over to the editors of major publishers the ability to make judgment on science and scientists. The “top” universities won’t consider people’s publications in low impact factor journals, it puts the judgment in the hands of people who really have no reason to exercise judgment at all. And that’s all been done in the aid of commerce, because they are now giant organizations making money out of it.
“In science there is more self-interest, paranoia and some more narcissism, or else why do we go into it? You think you are good enough to solve problems of Nature. Many scientists keep things to themselves. If the other person does not get funded, maybe you will be funded. All these things are in play, but these are the worst elements of science or scientists.” Dr. Robert Gallo
The education system where we live in now is corrupt to its bones.
Funding of any scientific university project only goes to the puppet scientists who follow the narrative of the controllers. Since Rockefeller started to mess around with science, step by step unbiased topics became more and more biased to big money. To science which would fit the Globalists Agenda. If you publish something which does not fit the Cabal agenda, you are lost. Obviously, this Herman Russchenberg is such a shill. A scientific swindler who is narcistic and only believes in his career! As a scientist myself I must relay that titles do not have a meaning for real pragmatic researchers. If a scumbag like Heinz Kissinger gets the Nobel prize for peace, then you really should question the institute who decides who gets this tile. These narcistic and main stream so called scientists create a lot of damage. If you analyze the facts, they are complicit in mass murder by advocating for deliberate poisoning of the atmosphere with all kind of crap such as Nano particles with Sr, Ba and AL not even to speak about all sorts of other poison.
So, what to do about the misuse of our tax money to sponsor these Main Stream professors who serve no good? We have to stand up against this cancer! Expose these people for what they are!